Which of the following would be considered a normal response to skin traction?

In the context of skin traction, a normal response includes minimal resistance to movement when the weights are adjusted. This indicates that the traction is effectively providing the intended therapeutic benefits, such as alignment or reduction of a fracture without excessive resistance that might signify underlying complications.

When weights are adjusted, the goal is to create a steady pull on the affected limb, which should allow for some movement without causing severe pain or resistance. If the traction is working properly, patients should feel some relief or ability to move the limb slightly, indicating that the tension is appropriate and the healing process can proceed.

The other options reflect adverse responses. Increased swelling at the site may signify complications like circulatory issues, while skin irritation and infections are signs that the traction may not be applied correctly or that the skin is not being adequately cared for. Signs of discomfort with both legs could suggest underlying issues such as improper alignment or complications associated with the traction technique. Therefore, the correct choice highlights a normal and expected outcome of skin traction treatment.